Online information source for semiconductor professionals

David Laidler, Philippe Leray, Koen D’Havé & Shaunee Cheng, IMEC, Leuven, Belgium

ABSTRACT

With the planner introduction of double patterning techniques, the focus of attention has been on tool overlay performance and whether or not this meets the required overlay for double patterning. However, as we require tighter and tighter overlay performance, the impact of the selected integration strategy plays a key part in determining the achievable overlay performance. However, as we require tighter and tighter overlay performance, the impact of the selected integration strategy plays a key part in determining the achievable overlay performance. Very little attention has been given at this time to the impact of, for example deposition steps, oxidation steps, CMP steps and the impact that they have on wafer deformation and therefore degraded overlay performance, which directly reduces the available overlay budget. Also, selecting the optimum alignment strategy to follow either direct or indirect alignment plays an important part in achieving optimum overlay performance. In this paper we investigate the process impact of various double patterning integration strategies and attempt to show the importance of selecting the right strategy with respect to achieving a manufacturable double patterning process. Furthermore, we report a methodology to minimize process overlay by modelling the non-linear grids for process-induces wafer deformation and demonstrate best achievable overlay by feeding this information back to the relevant process steps.