Online information source for semiconductor professionals

Discussion topic: Double Patterning technical concerns and its impact on fab operations

Popular articles

Micron moving fast on Hynix in Q208 NAND flash rankings, says iSuppli - 19 August 2008

Numonyx to close California Technology Center - 12 August 2008

Qimonda starts major reorganization: exits PC DRAM market - 13 October 2008

Applied Materials sees higher CapEx spending for 2009 - 15 August 2008

Micron close to Inotera share purchase, says Gartner - 06 October 2008

Walt Trybula, The Trybula Foundation Inc., & Brian Grenon, Grenon Consulting, Christian K. Kalus, President and Chief Technology Officer, SIGMA-C, Munich, Germany, Nigel Farrar, Vice President Lithography Applications, Cymer Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, Frank D. Masciocchi, Senior Vice President of Sales and
Marketing, Litel Instruments, San Diego, CA, USA, Martin McCullum, Programme Manager, Advanced Lithography Development, Nikon Precision Europe, Mircea Dusa, Senior Scientist & ASML Fellow, ASML, The Netherlands, & Rainer Pforr, Principal Engineer, Future Lithography, Infineon Technologies, Dresden, Germany

ABSTRACT

As the lithography is both the most costly and critical process towards fully functioning semiconductor devices, it is obvious that developments within the lithography field are closely followed and analyzed. This year at the SPIE Microlithography Conference it became clear that a major shift in lithography tool and process techniques is required to continue scaling as befits Moore’s Law. EUV lithography is not going to be ready for Intel’s needs at the 32nm node while immersion lithography has not ‘matured’ enough for the chip giant to ‘risk’ production for its introduction of 45nm node IC devices. Instead, Intel plans to retain the use of ‘dry’ 193nm ArF DUV tools, while adopting a Double Patterning (DP) imaging regime through to the 32nm node. Although there are various DP strategies possible, few experts in the field believe that some form of throughput, cycle-time and cost impact on fab operations will not occur. Although not all leading-edge IC manufacturers may pursue a DP strategy, it would now seem certain that everyone will need to look deeply into the pros and cons before making such critical manufacturing decisions. We are very pleased to have been able to assemble in this discussion piece, a group of experts within the lithography discipline to cover some of the key issues surrounding DP strategies, especially at such short notice, so soon after the SPIE Conference.

Mark Osborne, Semiconductor Fabtech, Editor-in-Chief

Download Please login to download the paper. No account yet? Please register. It's free!

Related jobs

Principal Embedded Software Engineer - MKS Instruments, Inc. - Wilmington, 05 September 2007

Staff R&D Engineer - Synopsys - Mountain View, 23 August 2007

Yield Ramp Consultant - Synopsys - Austin, 23 August 2007

Final Test Technician - Carl Zeiss SMT, Inc. - Peabody, 10 August 2007

Technical Support Engineer - Carl Zeiss SMT, Inc. - Peabody, 10 August 2007

Related articles

Sources of overlay error in double patterning integration schemes - 01 March 2008

Nikon enters double patterning market with its NSR-S620 ArF immersion scanner - 20 November 2008

The State of Array Packaging - 01 December 1999

Magnetic fields and the technology challenges they pose (a semiconductor perspective) - 01 December 2005

Construction Challenges for the 300 mm Fab - 01 December 1999

Reader comments

No comments yet!

Post your comment

Name:
Email:
Please enter the word you see in the image below: