Online information source for semiconductor professionals

Surrey NanoSystems raises US$4.2m for nanotube IC interconnects

25 August 2009 | By Mark Osborne | News > Wafer Processing

Popular articles

‚??Velocity‚?? the new buzzword in Intel‚??s PQS annual awards - 12 April 2012

Oberai discusses Magma’s move into solar PV yield management space - 29 August 2008

Applied Materials adds Jim Rogers to Board of Directors - 29 April 2008

TSMC honors suppliers at annual Supply Chain Management Forum - 03 December 2008

Sematech Litho Forum: Sematech mulling multi-beam mask writer effort - 12 May 2010

A new round of funding has been secured by Surrey NanoSystems, which is developing carbon nanotubes for future use as semiconductor interconnects. The University of Surrey’s spin-off raised US$4.2 million from Octopus Ventures, IP Group in a second round of funding.

"The semiconductor industry urgently needs a new interconnection technology. If you can solve the problem of growing precision carbon nanotubes at silicon-friendly temperatures - and we have - it opens up a massive potential market," says Ben Jensen, CTO of Surrey NanoSystems.  "We expect to be the company that is able to offer a viable new interconnection process for high-volume semiconductor fabrication, one that really exploits the incredible performance properties of carbon nanotubes."

The company claims that its ‘low’ temperature process (350 C or less), is more compatible with currently required processing conditions, compared to 700 C temperatures required with other carbon nanotube types. 

Related articles

Duke University to develop IP on nanotubes to replace copper interconnects - 07 November 2005

Copper interconnects with CVD low-k BEOL dielectric and their reliability - 01 March 2005

Evolution of copper plating chemistry requirements for the sub-90-nm node - 01 December 2003

Milestone: Applied Materials ships 2,500th CMP System - 04 April 2008

Taking control of the copper process at 65 nmTaking control of the copper process at 65 nm - 01 December 2003

Reader comments

No comments yet!

Post your comment

Name:
Email:
Please enter the word you see in the image below: