Online information source for semiconductor professionals

Micron says Taiwan Memory Co deal didn‚??t make sense: Sour grapes or astute business decision?

03 April 2009 | By Mark Osborne | Editor's Blog

Popular articles

New Product: Applied Materials new EUV reticle etch system provides nanometer-level accuracy - 19 September 2011

Oberai discusses Magma’s move into solar PV yield management space - 29 August 2008

‚??Velocity‚?? the new buzzword in Intel‚??s PQS annual awards - 12 April 2012

Applied Materials adds Jim Rogers to Board of Directors - 29 April 2008

New Product: ASML Brion‚??s Tachyon MB-SRAF enables OPC-like compute times - 19 September 2011

Steve Appleton, Micron’s Chairman and CEONot surprisingly Steve Appleton, Micron’s Chairman and CEO had a few words to say during its timely earnings conference call last night over the decision by the Taiwanese Government to partner with Elpida on process technology IP, the yet to be established Taiwan Memory Co DRAM enterprise.

As news reports noted yesterday, Micron is still in discussions with the Taiwanese over a possible Micron involvement and I would assume that would be concentrated on any involvement the Taiwanese maybe thinking about for Inotera and Nanya.

But that looks more remote as the days pass as Appleton made it clear that the deal on the table didn’t make business sense, full stop.

“We just haven’t seen any compelling reason yet in terms of benefits for Micron to participate,” noted Appleton.

He went on to say that the deal on the table would have seen cash secured from Taiwan but would have meant giving them Micron’s crown jewels, e.g. process IP.

“I don’t know about Elpida, but we’re not in a position today where we need to get an equity investment from a foreign entity in order and they have to turn over our technology, you know, with other considerations. We just don’t see the advantages for us to do that.”

Of course it helped that Micron is still sitting on a cash pile of just under US$1 billion so isn’t desperate for money…just yet.

Elpida isn’t in that luxury and from Micron’s perspective has much better technology than its rivals. The deal probably also didn’t work from the perspective that the touted cash injection from the Taiwan Government of approximately US$700 million plus, would have been a drop in the ocean for migrating the DRAM 300mm fabs to competitive nodes.

To get from 70nm to 50nm means adopting immersion lithography. That hasn’t happened at any Taiwan DRAM manufacturer due to lack of funds. US$700 million would allow the purchase of between 30 and 40 immersion tools depending on which litho supplier you choose. That might well be enough tools but would still be short of other tools required for the migration.

Other aspects of the deal have yet to be revealed and Appleton wasn’t going to spill the beans, just yet. IMHO, Micron probably went cold on the deal if other restrictions applied in relation to fab ownership. It is well known that Micron likes fire sales to pick-up cheap capacity and this deal probably didn’t give them that kind of deal. More importantly perhaps, it wouldn’t have given them the required control over operations.

I also get the impression Micron is continuing dialogue with Taiwan because it keeps them in the information loop on TMC, should it actually get off the ground. Micron may also spot an opportunity here or there in picking up any victims they may result from the formation of TMC, again with the focus on obtaining cheap capacity.

With respect to Elpida, Appleton’s comments suggest that Elpida didn’t have much choice and that the deal wouldn’t do much for them down the road. On that point we will have to wait and see.

That said, a combination of PSC, Elpida, ProMOS still isn’t big enough to compete with the likes of Hynix and Samsung without Inotera and Nanya, and that simply isn’t going to happen now or in the near future, IMHO.

From that perspective Micron has probably been astute enough to walk away from the current deal on the table. The sour grapes could come later if TMC proves to be successful.

Related articles

Taiwan Memory Co formation delayed - 30 March 2009

Micron cuts capex and idles capacity at Inotera as Qimonda collapses - 03 April 2009

Elpida becomes official technology partner of Taiwan Memory Co - 02 April 2009

Micron gains 60,000wspm from Inotera share purchase - 13 October 2008

Elpida consolidates Rexchip Electronics - 16 March 2009

Reader comments

Elpida's camp has their back to the wall and in all reality will be in bankruptcy without some intervention. So they needed to beg for taiwan's govt money and in return they get a bad deal. Micron was right to walk from this. They will come back to pick up the fallen Elpida pieces later.
By sam on 09 April 2009

Post your comment

Name:
Email:
Please enter the word you see in the image below: