Three bits of news released this week raised more questions than
gave answers, enough to remind me that curiosity killed the cat.
Eric Savitz over at Barrons was very
curious
over Intel’s announcement that its margins for its next quarter would
be impacted by the worse-than-expected price declines in NAND flash
memory. Kravitz bothered to post responses from financial analysts that
cover the company due to the fact that some of them didn’t buy into
Intel’s reasoning.
Christopher Danely of J.P. Morgan was
quoted as saying that, “NAND flash is only 3% of total Intel
revenue…for Intel’s gross margins to decline 2% in Q1, COGS would have
to increase $192 million, which is more than half of the company’s
total NAND revenue and would drop NAND gross margins from 20% to -47%
in only one quarter…we believe Intel’s microprocessor business is below
expectations from excess microprocessor inventory in the channel and
deteriorating PC demand.”
We all know that NAND is under
ridiculous pricing pressure, so why should Intel be surprised about
this? Why would it single out NAND when it’s also obvious that the
technology makes up such a small percentage of revenues? Curious
indeed.
The second curious concoction is over the announced
partnership between Micron and Nanya. Where does that leave Qimonda and
Inotera? Neither company has really stuck their heads out of the
bunkers to answer those questions yet.
Digitimes, amongst others, found the whole thing very
curious, and highlighted that Qimonda and Inotera may not yet actually know what to do.
The
French mainstream press seem to be gunning for STMicroelectronics boss,
Carlo Bozotti, after the French Government bought a stake in the
company. ST publicly denied rumors in the French press that Bozotti was
for the chop. The whole affair is rather strange and
EETimes found the story
very curious.
That’s
at least three curiosities in one short week, a week that still has two
days to run. Those cats are sure using up their nine lives very fast.