|
Inch by inch, EUVL is moving forward. The big problem is that it has not moved forward fast enough to be inserted confidently into any given future technology node. Although news from SEMATECH today touts ‘production-enabling breakthroughs’ being presented at the 2007 International EUVL Symposium, the press release lacks any mention of the timing for EUVL entering production!
This has become a recurring theme in 2007 as EUVL was pushed out at the 32nm node at the SPIE Lithography conference in February this year, and no one has yet been brave enough to re-insert it at any future node with any conviction.
That aside, SEMATECH has listed the ‘breakthroughs,’ so we will have to see if this makes any difference to putting a ‘date’ on EUVL entering fabs. Below is a sample of advances as revealed by SEMATECH technologists in papers that are being delivered at the symposium: - The best EUV mask blank defect density in the world today – 0.1 per cm2 at 56nm resolution – will be reported by Chan-Uk Jeon, program manager of the Mask Blank Development Center in Albany, NY. SEMATECH also has created a detailed database of the source of the defects and is developing mitigation methods, such as smoothing, to reduce pit defects. (This SEMATECH smoothing process has achieved an 800X improvement in defect levels.) SEMATECH’s work will likely enable mask blanks to be ready for EUV beta tools in 2009.
- SEMATECH has achieved only five added defects at 56nm sensitivity in EUV mask blank defect totals, according to a paper by Patrick Kearney, Member Technical Staff. This milestone was enabled with industry-leading 56nm defect inspection sensitivity on multilayer coated blanks, and is rooted in SEMATECH’s strategy of collaborating with suppliers to bring together all elements of the industry.
- A manufacturable EUVL reticle solution also requires defect-free reticle handling. EUVL reticle protection using SEMATECH’s “sPod” design shows an average of less than one particle added per 100 separate reticle transfers, as explained in a paper by Long He, project engineer. Tests also show the sPod as a potential solution for shipping and storage.
- Using the industry’s best EUV resist exposure capability, SEMATECH has demonstrated that effective resolution down to 24nm can be achieved with current resists and optimized illumination conditions. These results are documented by Andy Ma, EUV resist bench project manager. Ma also describes remaining resist challenges, including linewidth roughness and photospeed.
- Current optical designs for EUV collectors are not very efficient, but SEMATECH has developed a series of upgrades that could boost collector efficiency by 2.8X. That would reduce the industry’s critical dependence on high-power sources or improve tool throughput and cost effectiveness. The designs are explained in a paper by Michael Goldstein, Senior Technologist.
- Detailed cost-of-ownership targets for EUVL – as determined by SEMATECH’s detailed cost models – will be reported by Phil Seidel, Senior Member Technical Staff. These performance targets have been integrated into the consortium’s technology development projects, and show that the key elements for cost effective EUVL include source power, optics lifetime, and mask blank defect reduction.
|
Comment by GUEST on 2007-11-03 13:14:18 Just found something much better than EUV, imprint or current lithography: http://www.nanoink.net/WhatisDPN.htm | Comment by GUEST on 2007-11-02 10:42:45 Nikon and Canon will kick ASML off the park in EUV | Comment by GUEST on 2007-11-02 10:32:09 If there is a company that can pull it off it is certainly ASML. The question is not if EUV is a technically viable solution, the question is will EUV be an economically viable solution. At an estimated $60M a tool and more than likely significantly reduced throughput relative to more conventional exposure techniques the capital investment for a wafer fab will be staggering. | Comment by flipsu5 on 2007-11-02 10:31:35 The history of lithography is filled with wrong predictions. It was said immersion would be too dirty to work, but it is working, at least at a couple of places today. 157nm was supposed to follow 193nm but disappeared, because new materials were hard to find. Laser mask writers were supposed to be incapable of matching e-beam writers but today ETEC has disappeared, since mask shop productivity critically depends on the use of the faster laser writers, even on OPC and SRAF layers. | Comment by GUEST on 2007-11-02 10:30:33 What is the flare spec for ASML's EUV tool? I think it is at least an order of magnitude higher than state-of-the-art 193nm tools. | Comment by GUEST on 2007-11-01 17:05:40 Don't worry. EUV will be ready in 2012 for the 22nm node and the simultaneous conversion to 450mm. :) | Comment by niekgo on 2007-11-01 17:05:19 Remember the days ASML came with the first immersion tool? It couldn't work, experts said, because of boiling water, bubbles, contamination of the liquid. And look, after 4 years, ASML has an installed base of more than 60 immersion tools world wide of which about 25 are used in mass production, mainly in the memory segment. Every day more than 50.000 wafers are made on immersion tools from ASML. Immersion is an accepted technology and so will be Extreme Ultra Violet. Don't underestimate Martin van den Brink, CTO from ASML. If he has something in his mind it will work one day. Besides that, ASML received several orders for EUV pre production tools from major players....they believe in EUV. | Comment by GUEST on 2007-10-31 17:03:00 No - there will be no EUV. Not every technology that gets explored gets put into production, despite all the work into it. And there is not enough time for so-called "re-invention". Shorter wavelength has stronger photoelectrons remember? | Comment by GUEST on 2007-10-31 15:27:35 It is interesting that 32nm or 22nm has dropped from the insertion suggestion. We know that EUV won't be used at Intel or Samsung for 32nm or 22nm because they will be using 193nm immersion with double patterning at that time. Without 32nm application, EUV is pretty much another expensive alternative. So most likely EUV will have to reinvent itself, maybe with a shorter wavelength, like 9nm. | Comment by GUEST on 2007-10-30 09:22:01 One good thing that came out of this work is the sPod, since it can be developed to keep things (other than reticles) clean. The EUV work seems to have been hoping for a "surprise", but what's the surprise? EUV has shorter wavelength -> smaller optical resolution, but higher photon energy -> other problems. |
|