Online information source for semiconductor professionals

Elpida targets early migration of DRAM to 50nm

06 October 2008 | By Mark Osborne | News > Wafer Processing

Popular articles

Micron moving fast on Hynix in Q208 NAND flash rankings, says iSuppli - 19 August 2008

Numonyx to close California Technology Center - 12 August 2008

Qimonda starts major reorganization: exits PC DRAM market - 13 October 2008

Micron close to Inotera share purchase, says Gartner - 06 October 2008

Applied Materials sees higher CapEx spending for 2009 - 15 August 2008

Elpida MemoryElpida Memory is targeting the start of migration of DRAM production to its 50nm process technology by the end of December, 2008, instead of previous plans for the migration to start in the January-March 2009, timeframe. According to Elpida, the 50nm devices offer a 50 percent productivity boost over its 65nm devices that have also been revamped with a redesign that reduces the die size over its original 65nm design.

Volume production of the revised 65nm design will also enter production before the end of 2008 and will be also be rolled-out at its Taiwan-based Rexchip joint venture and its manufacturing partner Powerchip Semiconductor (PSC).

Related jobs

Materials Program Manager - Applied Materials - Germany, 04 March 2008

Sales Engineer Continental - Freescale - Munich/Nuremberg, 19 February 2008

Materials Program Manager - Applied Materials - Xi'an, 13 December 2007

Programmer Analyst-LiveLink - AMI Semiconductor - POCATELLO, 10 August 2007

Diffusion Engineer - AMI Semiconductor - Pocatello, 10 August 2007

Related articles

Elpida Memory increases capital spending - 07 August 2008

Elpida forms new joint venture to build 300mm DRAM fab in China - 06 August 2008

Elpida joins cash preservation society and more! - 06 November 2008

Elpida gains first foundry partner - 20 June 2008

DRAMeXchange expects second tier DRAM producers to cut capacity - 22 September 2008

Reader comments

early migration of DRAM to 50nm? I believe Elpida's annoucement is more of delaying 50nm vol production and tentatively migrate to revised 65nm design instead to save on equipment spending for 50nm class.
By reyu on 08 October 2008

Post your comment

Name:
Email:
Please enter the word you see in the image below: